The ESPN+ freight train continues rolling on. During Wednesday’s earnings call, the company announced that subscriptions for ESPN+ had increased to 21.3 million.
For some context, here’s a brief rundown from our archive of the previously announced subscription numbers for ESPN+.
- April 2018: launch
- September 2018: 1 million
- February 2019: 2 million
- November 2019: 3.5 million
- February 2020: 7.6 million
- May 2020: 7.9 million
- August 2020: 8.6 million
- November 2020: 10.3 million
- February 2021: 12.1 million
- May 2021: 13.8 million
- August 2021: 14.9 million
- November 2021: 17.1 million
Man, that is a staggering increase, with subscriptions nearly tripling from where they were two years ago.
Subscriptions really began to spike when the Disney bundle when Disney+ went live in November of 2019. ESPN+ subscriptions doubled following that launch, and have continued increasing since. Another factor that likely had a (perhaps small) hand in the recent increase: the inclusion of ESPN+ (and Disney+) in the Hulu Live subscription package, which took effect at the end of last year.
In addition, the average subscription fee for ESPN+ users has increased, which is a good thing for the company.
In August of 2020, ESPN+ increased to $5.99 per month, and both the yearly price ($49.99) and Disney bundle ($12.99) remained unchanged. In July of 2021, the company announced that ESPN+ would be increasing to $6.99 per month, with yearly subscription prices increasing to $69.99 (it had previously increased to $59.99 in the year between monthly increases). The Disney bundle also increased to $13.99/month in the years since its launch.
Back at the end of 2018, when the bundle wasn’t a thing, the average cost was $4.67. At the end of 2019, following the bundle’s launch, it was $4.44. That number had barely moved at the end of 2020, sitting at $4.48. Now, two years later after the price increases, it’s up to $5.16.
It’s tough to compare this data to cable networks because of how tough it is to come across average subscriber fees and carriage estimates. But chew on this: in October 2020, Variety pegged ESPN2’s carriage fee at $1.04 per month. Last month, the Sports Business Journal reported that ESPN2 was in 79.65 million households. Over a full year, that’s $994 million in annual revenue – way less than ESPN+’s $1.32 billion. It even compares favorably to FS1, in 78.566 million households at an estimated $1.12 per month, or $1.056 billion per year. Yeah, carriage fees for both of those networks have more than likely increased since that Variety estimate a year and a half ago, but the comparison to ESPN+ is stark. NFL Network, in far fewer households at 57.452 million, pulls an annual revenue of $1.234 billion (again, based on that carriage rate from a year and a half ago) from fees, much closer than you’d likely expect.
Anyway, the sheer amount of money brought in by Disney’s networks (including ESPN+) is jaw-dropping, aided by both the cable bundle and the streaming bundle. For some of the chatter about a streaming bubble, Disney doesn’t appear to be there – at least yet.
About Joe Lucia
I hate your favorite team. I also sort of hate most of my favorite teams.
Recent Posts
Donald Trump seemed to have no idea what Josh Pate was talking about regarding college football
Pate was right that they didn't discuss politics, but they also didn't discuss college football.
Donald Trump refutes Urban Meyer’s recollection of golf discussion: ‘They talk to me about politics’
"More so than football. They liked politics."
Dave Pasch, Doris Burke add to Mike Tirico Olympic praise on ESPN NBA broadcast
"What a fabulous closing statement today from the great Mike Tirico, our longtime friend and colleague."
Andraya Carter offers blistering critique of Tennessee’s Kim Caldwell amid losing streak
"There’s very little belief in this Tennessee locker room when I watch them."
So far in 2026, Michael Jordan has been interviewed on Fox more than he’s appeared on NBC
Turns out, if NBC really wanted to get their money’s worth, instead of asking Michael Jordan about the...
Los Angeles Angels owner blames payroll on declining TV revenue
He also suggested winning isn't even in the "top five" things fans care about.