As Draymond Green and Austin Rivers engaged in the latest drummed-up athlete media beef this week, Cam Newton used the opportunity to offer a broader commentary — and warning — about all athlete-hosted content.
While Newton is certainly liable to his fair share of drama and beef and isn’t afraid to clash with other hosts online or in mainstream media, he believes the barbs thrown back and forth by Green and Rivers show a larger problem among athletes who talk about sports.
“What we are witnessing here is the opportunities for player-led media to showcase itself. We’ve always wanted to be more than just athletes. We always felt like we were qualified to speak about the sport,” Newton said on his podcast, 4th and 1. “But ladies and gentleman, boys and girls … understand, if this is what we want, this is what you’re going to keep getting. If you have players talking about players and other players critiquing players, it’s going to be this same dog and pony show.”
The problem, Newton said, is that athletes rely too heavily on beef to generate interest in their work, and that in doing so, they also squash other perspectives in an unhealthy way.
“That’s what you’re going to keep getting from these athlete-led platforms who take offense to what’s said,” Newton said. “But to the athletes, you have to understand, you’ve gotta be able to have diversity in your content. Because if you’re just going back and forth saying, ‘I, I, I’, ‘me, me, me,’ that’s not a sustainable recipe, brother.”
Throughout his tenure in media as a podcast host and ESPN contributor, Newton has consistently explored the dynamics between athletes and media. Newton knows a thing or two about facing criticism; when he played, Newton was one of the most scrutinized quarterbacks in sports history. But more recently, Newton has preached the value of diverse viewpoints in media.
On Wednesday’s 4th and 1, Newton argued that traditional sports media deserves a seat at the table even as athletes encroach on the industry, giving the audience the ability to pick and choose the perspectives they consume. When Green and Rivers try to one-up each other under the pretense that one of them is more worthy to give an opinion than the other, Newton said, it undermines the ability of all athletes to have a voice.
“I just think we have to be extremely mindful, because it’s a lot of alpha energy that’s talking into these mics, where it’s like, come on,” he said. “I’ve been guilty too … (but) it’s all entertainment. But now you’ve got Austin Rivers and Draymond Green, it’s a lot of personal attacks.”
Newton’s point certainly is refreshing for anyone who is tired of athletes who transfer locker-room spitting contests to their podcasts and shows. And it also is generally uplifting to others like him trying to rise to the top of the YouTube game or get in somewhere like ESPN, even if it sounds like criticism.
The point is to make entertaining, informative content, not to establish superiority over the competition.
“Talk about the take, not the person,” Newton said.
About Brendon Kleen
Brendon is a Media Commentary staff writer at Awful Announcing. He has also covered basketball and sports business at Front Office Sports, SB Nation, Uproxx and more.
Recent Posts
NFL plans to eliminate home game protections for international series
The league also raised the cap on international games from eight to 10 starting in 2027.
Nate Silver reveals FiveThirtyEight almost sold to The Athletic before ABC News deal
"We came quite close to securing a deal with The Athletic, close enough that the founders came to New York for an entire week of meetings to sort through every detail."
John Middlekauff predicts Amazon will add ‘Sunday Night Football’ to exisiting NFL package
Middlekauff is predicting that Amazon's NFL presence won't stop at Thursday nights.
Nick Wright: Stephen A. Smith’s constant beefs with athletes ‘makes all of us look bad’
"And also, here's the other thing. You're the only guy who does it."
NBA could televise Draft Lottery ping pong ball selection beginning next year
No doubt, the change is likely being made in the interest of increasing transparency.
The Oklahoman says Thunder-Israel op-ed ‘did not meet our opinion standards’
"The op-ed has been removed, and we deeply regret any distress this may have caused."